- From: <JAMESICUS@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 15:33:07 EST
- To: html-tidy@w3.org
Sorry, Dave, I meant to send you the following message via this list. I will include it here now - together with your response - for general information. On Wed, 1 Dec 1999 I wrote to Dave Raggett: >> Dave: >> >> When I tried to Validate my Tidy XHTML upgraded pages using the >> W3C validator, they were rejected due to "invalid DTD". >> >> When I replaced the Tidy applied DTD etc with the Transitional >> one from the W3C XHTML page they validated perfectly. >> >> The Document information was then: >> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >> <!DOCTYPE >> html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" >> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> >> >> Comments, Dave? > I suspect the problem is caused by a change to the file name > for the DTDs. Hitherto, these didn't start with the xhtml1- > prefix. I am checking with the working group on this and will > sync up with the spec for the December release of Tidy. (D.R.) Additionally, Dave, when I use the attributes: xml:lang="en" lang="en" in the HTML root element, Tidy reports unknown attribute "xml:lang" - again, the page validates error free in the W3C Validator. James Pickering
Received on Friday, 3 December 1999 15:33:52 UTC