- From: Chuck Baslock <cbaslock@kansas.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:41:56 -0500
- To: "Zac Thompson" <zthompso@mks.com>, <html-tidy@w3.org>
Ok in "Transitional"
Unrecognized in "Strict"
Per
http://validator.w3.org
----- Original Message -----
From: Zac Thompson <zthompso@mks.com>
To: <html-tidy@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 13:14
Subject: strike, s, u tags OK in strict DTD?
>
> <strike></strike>
> <s></s>
> <u></u>
>
> I don't think these are valid except with the Transitional ("Loose")
> DTD. Am I missing something, or is this a known issue? A lot of
> the files I'm working with contain the <u> tag right now.
>
> ==========
> [C:/Temp/html] tidy strike.htm
>
> Tidy (vers 7th July 1999) Parsing "strike.htm"
>
> "strike.htm" appears to be HTML 4.0
> no warnings or errors were found
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN">
> <html>
> <head>
> <title>testing ability to catch strike, s, u</title>
> </head>
> <body>
> <p><strike>This is one way</strike></p>
>
> <p><s>Here's another way to do it</s></p>
>
> <p><u>This should be underlined</u></p>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> [C:/Temp/html]
> ==========
>
> Zac
>
> --
> Zac Thompson [mailto:zthompson@mks.com]
> Mortice Kern Systems Inc. [http://www.mks.com]
> 185 Columbia St. W. Waterloo, ON, Canada, N2L 5Z5
>
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 1999 17:42:46 UTC