xproc-dev@w3.org from February 2009 by author

Costello, Roger L.

• ANN: XProc Tutorial (Saturday, 21 February)

Dave Pawson

• Re: [closed] Re: security. Is this implementable? (Thursday, 5 February)

David A. Lee

• base URI after select= in p:input, p:identity (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: Extension function prefixes/namespace (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Extension function prefixes/namespace (Saturday, 7 February)

Florent Georges

• Re: XProc test http-request-005 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Calabash 0.9.4 and p:http-request; response content conversion (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Wrong CRLF in http-request-006 on tests.xproc.org (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Content-Type of http-request-007 on tests.xproc.org (Thursday, 5 February)
• Wrong CRLF in http-request-006 on tests.xproc.org (Thursday, 5 February)
• Content-Type of http-request-007 on tests.xproc.org (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: XProc test http-request-005 (Thursday, 5 February)
• XProc test http-request-005 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Expected results of http-request-005 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: http-request: error content (Wednesday, 4 February)
• p:http-request: error content (Tuesday, 3 February)

Inigo Surguy

• Re: Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML (Thursday, 26 February)

James Fuller

• [ANN] XML Prague 2009 March 21-22, only one month to go ... register now (Friday, 20 February)

mozer

• Re: [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: [closed] Re: calabash: p:identity with multiple inline (Wednesday, 4 February)

Norman Walsh

• [closed] Re: p:http-request's send-authorization use case? (Thursday, 5 February)
• [closed] Re: Extension XPathExpressions in step arguments - 2.7 XPath Extension Functions (Thursday, 5 February)
• [closed] Re: xml-add- base and relative (Thursday, 5 February)
• [closed] Re: Calabash. p:step-available (Thursday, 5 February)
• [closed] Re: add-attribute adding namespace declarations. (Thursday, 5 February)
• [closed] Re: security. Is this implementable? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Re: Calabash, pass in the stylesheet path on command line? (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Re: Expected results of http-request-005 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• Announce: XML Calabash 0.9.4 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [closed] Re: instance name visible within a custom step? (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Expected results of http-request-005 (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Expected results of http-request-005 (Monday, 2 February)

Philip Fennell

• Which is more efficient in the pipe, a whole feed or a sequence of entries? (Friday, 27 February)
• Having trouble with Calabash 0.9.4 and http-request (Friday, 27 February)
• RE: Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML (Thursday, 26 February)
• Report document generated by 'validate-with-schematron' is not well-formed XML (Thursday, 26 February)

Steve Whitlatch

• Re: Calabash, pass in the stylesheet path on command line? (Thursday, 5 February)
• Calabash, pass in the stylesheet path on command line? (Wednesday, 4 February)

Toman_Vojtech@emc.com

• RE: XProc test http-request-005 (Tuesday, 10 February)
• RE: Wrong CRLF in http-request-006 on tests.xproc.org (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: Content-Type of http-request-007 on tests.xproc.org (Thursday, 5 February)
• RE: http-request: error content (Wednesday, 4 February)
• RE: Expected results of http-request-005 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 13:51:58 UTC