Re: Do you use the W3C RDF validator ?

On 23/11/2023 15:42, Vincent Emonet wrote:
> (...)
> From my point of view:
> - A minimal modern validator should at least enable users to provide 
> RDF in various format (the classic xml, turtle, trig, n3, nquads, 
> ntriples, ideally it could even support JSON-LD).
> - And it should enable users to convert from any formats to any other 
> format (if you can do parsing, you can also do serializing, so why not 
> doing both?)
> - Ideally it should be implemented to work fully on the client 
> (because decentralization, and scalability, and we have now good 
> JS/wasm options to parse in the browser now), so that it can be 
> deployed to any CDN without the cost of hosting a server. If people 
> needs an API we can find a way to setup a client-side API (look like 
> an API, query like an API, but execution on the client)

you mean, something like that ? :-)

(disclaimer: this is a very rough and early prototype)

The reason I asked the 2nd point was precisely to determine whether this 
prototype could be a satisfactory replacement from the current ageing 
validator.

>
>
> Best,
>
> Vincent
>
>
> Le mer. 22 nov. 2023 à 13:46, <hans..teijgeler@quicknet.nl 
> <mailto:hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>> a écrit :
>
>     Hi Pierre-Antoine,
>
>     I use the IDLab Turtle Validator <http://ttl.summerofcode.be/>
>
>     Regards, Hans
>