W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: Specification of "text-align-last" property

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:00:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302061D0A0B@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "srinivasarao vegunta" <mukalsjn@lycos.com>, <xsl-editors@w3.org>
This question has been raised previously and dealt with at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2004OctDec/0011
 
We believe the XSL 1.1 spec is unambiguous with regard to this issue now
as discussed in the above referenced email (except see section 7.16.10
for the "text-align-last" description in XSL 1.1).
 
If after reviewing that email, someone believes there is still an
ambiguity, please let us know.
 
paul


________________________________

	From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org
[mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of srinivasarao vegunta
	Sent: Tuesday, 2007 January 23 23:53
	To: xsl-editors@w3.org
	Subject: Specification of "text-align-last" property
	
	
I noticed a different behaviour of the two main XSL-FO-Processors
RenderX XEP and AntennaHouse XSLFormatter with respect to the
"text-align-last" property of XSL-FO. Both support-teams say they are
right. Maybe I can get an "official" answer from the list.

The problem can be summarizes as: "When breaking a block by an included
block, is the last line before the included block affected by
text-align-last?"

For Example:

<fo:block text-align="justify" text-align-last="justify">
  brah brah<fo:block/>brah<fo:leader leader-pattern="dots"/>
</fo:block>

will result in
"""
brah      brah
brah..........
"""
(notice the alignment of the first line)

or in

"""
brah brah
brah..........
"""

I am not really sure which one is conform to XSL-FO 1.1. Maybe someone
can help.
	

________________________________


	Free Movies <http://cinema.lycos.com/?if_Event=mail>  100's of
Free Feature Length Films - Meet Friends, Watch Movies & Win! 
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 02:03:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:58 GMT