Paul, please be aware that mail from srinivasarao vegunta appears to be link spam: these are repostings of old messages from the archives, with links added, presumably in order to get a google ranking for the linked sites. Michael Kay _____ From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org [mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul Sent: 25 January 2007 02:00 To: srinivasarao vegunta; xsl-editors@w3.org Subject: RE: Specification of "text-align-last" property This question has been raised previously and dealt with at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2004OctDec/0011 We believe the XSL 1.1 spec is unambiguous with regard to this issue now as discussed in the above referenced email (except see section 7.16.10 for the "text-align-last" description in XSL 1.1). If after reviewing that email, someone believes there is still an ambiguity, please let us know. paul _____ From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org [mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of srinivasarao vegunta Sent: Tuesday, 2007 January 23 23:53 To: xsl-editors@w3.org Subject: Specification of "text-align-last" property I noticed a different behaviour of the two main XSL-FO-Processors RenderX XEP and AntennaHouse XSLFormatter with respect to the "text-align-last" property of XSL-FO. Both support-teams say they are right. Maybe I can get an "official" answer from the list. _____Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 09:26:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 August 2007 00:11:46 GMT