W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: Specification of "text-align-last" property

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:24:08 -0000
To: "'Grosso, Paul'" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008c01c74062$9107d210$6401a8c0@turtle>
Paul, please be aware that mail from srinivasarao vegunta appears to be link
spam: these are repostings of old messages from the archives, with links
added, presumably in order to get a google ranking for the linked sites.
 
Michael Kay


  _____  

From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org [mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
Sent: 25 January 2007 02:00
To: srinivasarao vegunta; xsl-editors@w3.org
Subject: RE: Specification of "text-align-last" property


This question has been raised previously and dealt with at

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2004OctDec/0011
 
We believe the XSL 1.1 spec is unambiguous with regard to this issue now as
discussed in the above referenced email (except see section 7.16.10 for the
"text-align-last" description in XSL 1.1).
 
If after reviewing that email, someone believes there is still an ambiguity,
please let us know.
 
paul


  _____  

From: xsl-editors-request@w3.org [mailto:xsl-editors-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of srinivasarao vegunta
Sent: Tuesday, 2007 January 23 23:53
To: xsl-editors@w3.org
Subject: Specification of "text-align-last" property


I noticed a different behaviour of the two main XSL-FO-Processors
RenderX XEP and AntennaHouse XSLFormatter with respect to the
"text-align-last" property of XSL-FO. Both support-teams say they are
right. Maybe I can get an "official" answer from the list.

	

  _____  
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 09:26:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:58 GMT