RE: 1.1 WD Comments on region-name and flow-name properties

--- Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I think, in this case, that would *not* be an
> error, but that 
> > the flow's 
> > content would just not be generated.  I believe
> this is the 
> > case because 
> > the region-name definition states that we can
> define 
> > different names for 
> > the same region on the odd and even pages of 
> > fo-repeatable-page-master-alternatives (e.g., to
> have 
> > different static 
> > headers depending on whether we're on an odd or
> even page.)
> 
> You are correct that this is not an error.
> 
> The SG hesitates to make a wording change here
> because
> we cannot list everything that is an error.  In
> general
> in the spec, if it isn't disallowed, it's allowed.
> 

I agree with your reasoning here.

Thanks,
Glen