W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > October to December 2002

basic-link missing from %block;

From: W. Eliot Kimber <eliot@isogen.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:55:53 -0500
Message-ID: <3DB809F9.5080101@isogen.com>
To: xsl-editors@w3.org

I've been experimenting with using basic link around blocks overlayed on 
graphics to implement hot spots (works with XSL Formatter--XEP currently 
doesn't fully implement absolute positioning of blocks, but should 
otherwise work there too. Haven't tried with Epic yet).

I noticed that %block; does not include basic-link but basic-link allows 
block. This suggests that basic-link should be allowed where ever block 
is allowed. There is already an explicit constraint that basic-link 
cannot contain blocks when it occurs in an inline-only context and 
visa-versa, so I don't think that allowing basic-link in %block; will 
open up any potential ambiguity of allowed combinations of elements.


W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@isogen.com
Consultant, ISOGEN International

1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 10:55:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:22 UTC