W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xsl-editors@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: [xsl] XSLT 1.1 comments

From: Michael Kay <mhkay@iclway.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:20:01 -0000
To: <xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com>
Cc: <xsl-editors@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c0943e$1b303040$ce443c3e@oemcomputer>
> introducing the need for language bindings only reduces general
> interoperability while giving a small boost to
> interoperability between small axes of implementations.
I don't understand. How can defining a Java language binding which
implementors are at liberty to implement or not, reduce interoperability
when compared with allowing each implementor to invent a different Java
language binding, which is the current situation at XSLT 1.0?

Mike Kay
Received on Sunday, 11 February 2001 10:18:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:21 UTC