> introducing the need for language bindings only reduces general > interoperability while giving a small boost to > interoperability between small axes of implementations. > I don't understand. How can defining a Java language binding which implementors are at liberty to implement or not, reduce interoperability when compared with allowing each implementor to invent a different Java language binding, which is the current situation at XSLT 1.0? Mike KayReceived on Sunday, 11 February 2001 10:18:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:52 GMT