Contradiction in the XSLT spec? From http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#qname "The default namespace is not used for unprefixed names." Yet... From http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#section-Creating-Elements-with-xsl:element "If the namespace attribute is not present then the QName is expanded into an expanded-name using the namespace declarations in effect for the xsl:element element, including any default namespace declaration." Also, from http://www.w3.org/1999/11/REC-xslt-19991116-errata/#E7 "If there is a default namespace in scope, then it is used to expand an unprefixed QName [that's the argument of element-available()]" So, should the general section on QNames be qualified to account for the cases where the default namespace *is* used? Evan Lenz XYZFind Corp.Received on Sunday, 11 February 2001 12:42:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 August 2007 00:11:32 GMT