W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2016

Re: What’s the uptake of FOP 2.1?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:17:02 +0100
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8737p4krld.fsf@nwalsh.com>
David Lee <dlee@calldei.com> writes:
> On 2 public production web sites I have been involved in they switch
> from FOP 1.1 to 2.1 (org.apache.xmlgraphics:fop:2.1) a few years
> back

Good to know.

> To date the only issue I know of is a persistent complaint from gradle
> about POM relocations for xml-apis -- that library is embedded and
> referenced all over. I have yet found a conflict-free resolution. It
> works though.
>
> ---> warning from gradle resolving fop in conjunction with other dependencies
>       org.apache.xmlgraphics:fop:2+
> POM relocation to another version number is not fully supported in Gradle : xml-apis#xml-apis;2.0.2 relocated to xml-apis#xml-apis;1.0.b2.
> Please update your dependency to directly use the correct version 'xml-apis#xml-apis;1.0.b2'.
> Resolution will only pick dependencies of the relocated element.  Artifacts and other metadata will be ignored.

Yeah. I’ve poked at that with a sharp stick a few times as well. Never figured out how
to fix it. I expect that the solution is to get the owner of the xml-apis repo to
fix it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com

Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 05:17:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 May 2016 05:17:29 UTC