W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Doctype declarations on XML produced in zips

From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 17:34:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAO_-xyLU+eF3Xj6G1ERDJLwOVz4tepWK1B8MYwi-gpwMQRk3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Norm,

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Wendell Piez <wapiez@wendellpiez.com> writes:
>> (Of course, this would be p:serialization ... what would be the XProc
>> way to bind it to c:entry ...?)
> Well, p:serialization isn’t (currently) designed to be named and
> reused.

Oh is that why I have one for almost every output port? :-)

> For the p:zip step, I think we’d just extend the content model
> of c:entry to allow the serialization options.
> But at that point, you’d probably really want a mechanism to name and
> reuse them…

Even without, having them settable at all would be a big advance ...
at least, towards supporting last-century systems that expect to see
FPIs on all their contents (for no good discernible reason I can see).

So thanks, I'm looking at that github thing.

(Calabash/XProc <= awesome btw.)

Cheers, Wendell

>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The Future is something which everyone
> http://nwalsh.com/            | reaches at the rate of sixty minutes an
>                               | hour, whatever he does, whoever he
>                               | is.--C. S. Lewis

Wendell Piez | http://www.wendellpiez.com
XML | XSLT | electronic publishing
Eat Your Vegetables
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 21:34:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 17 May 2016 21:34:36 UTC