W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Default pipeline?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:30:50 +0000
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bmxyfaq1x.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> If you run "make" without a make file, it looks for "Makefile".
> If you run "ant" without a build file, it looks for "build.xml".
>
> If you run an XProc processor without specifying a pipeline, should it
> look for a default pipeline. What should it be called?

Maybe, but that's for implementations to document, not the spec. to
require.

I would expect to configure the specific name in the
site-configuration for my pipeline processor, I guess.  That way it
could be absolute or relative. . .

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLmP6akjnJixAXWBoRApK7AJ4l8vcjECyBmKU746I/0znUxw4mWwCfbPiu
Ivn7LUijFXh2eIbLGrCQtAQ=
=WkBc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2010 14:31:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 March 2010 14:31:21 GMT