W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > February 2010

[closed] Re: Current XProc schema documents valid?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 08:04:39 -0500
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2tytnly8o.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Adam Constabaris <adamc@unc.edu> writes:

> Either one on its own could be chalked up to bugs in the validation
> tools, but th makes me suspect there may be an issue with the schemas. A
> spot check of the .rnc didn't reveal any obvious definition of use-when.

Yep. My bad.

I would have sworn the spec build validated the examples, and by
extension the schema, but I guess I'd have been wrong.

> Does anybody have validation working against these documents?


                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Men are more like the times they live
http://nwalsh.com/            | in than they are like their
                              | fathers.--Ali Ibn-abi-talib

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 13:05:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:06 UTC