Re: EXProc - editorial: use different prefixes for File Utils and XPath functions

On 22 April 2010 12:10, ? wrote:

> Oh, I agree with that. But I was referring to using the same prefix for
> two different namespace URIs in the EXProc specifications. The File
> Utils steps and the XPath extension functions are currently in two
> different namespaces, but they are both referred to using the same
> prefix "pfx" in the text.

  Oh right.  My fault, I read your message too fast, sorry about that.
 So yes, of course :-)

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/