Re: EXProc step proposal: message

On 22 April 2010 15:51, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

>
> Looks good to me. My message step doesn't have stderr/stdout options, but
> that's a good addition.

+1. the more 'standard' extensions, the better.
Especially when I can read which processors implement which
extensions on exproc.org <grin/>


regards

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:55:02 UTC