- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:58:14 +0200
- To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
- Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:42 AM, <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> wrote: >> But I, again, voice for the suggestion >> >> > 2) To add an attribute on p:with-option that says >> > @bound-like-this-option="$foo" ; if foo is bound then the variable >> > will be bound and the value will be the content of the >> select and will >> > not be bound if $foo isn't bound >> >> We could also add for more complex use case the >> p:is-option-bound() function > > So what about the case when the select expression refers to multiple > options/variables (some/all of which can be unbound)? That's what I called a "complex use case" where you cannot avoid using p:choose. Xmlizer
Received on Thursday, 28 May 2009 07:58:51 UTC