W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > May 2009

Re: XProc and SMIL, Orchestrating Pipeline Steps

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:09:31 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2r5z9c6lw.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Philip Fennell <Philip.Fennell@bbc.co.uk> writes:

> Vojtech,
>> I would say that p:pipeinfo would be the most appropriate solution.
> As you'd want to declare the timesheet at the root of the pipeline you
> couldn't use p:pipeinfo because it is not allowed on p:pipeline or
> p:declare-step. I think, if it were to be possible to use Timesheets
> with Xproc, then the PI is the best approach.

If you had a SMIL-aware XProc processor, why would this not be

  <p:declare-step ...>

       timesheet goes here

You might want some sort of attribute on p:pipeinfo to identify which
pipeinfo was about SMIL, but I don't see why the timesheet has to come
at the root.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Human felicity is produced not so much
http://nwalsh.com/            | by great pieces of good fortune that
                              | seldom happen, as by little advantages
                              | that occur every day.--Benjamin Franklin

Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 13:10:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC