W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2009

Re: calabash with primary attributes

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:57:37 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0903310157r4f957df8m5ee9e07ebd1245a7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tobias Vogt <tobias_vogt_@web.de>
Cc: xproc-dev@w3.org
I guess the question is, can't we augment the algorithm > its trivial
either way to implement and I don't see any confusion allowing such.

ta, J


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Tobias Vogt <tobias_vogt_@web.de> wrote:
> James Fuller wrote:
>>
>> consider this trivial pipeline
>
>> <p:declare-step xmlns:foo="http://acme.com/test"
>
> xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc">
>>
>> <p:input port="source"/>
>> <p:output port="result"/>
>> <p:input port="extra" primary="false"/>
>
>> <p:identity/>
>
>> </p:declare-step>
>
>> as I understand things the source and result should be marked primary
>
> automatically[...]
>
> I believe Calabash is correct to not mark the "source" port as primary.
> According to the spec:
> "[Definition: If a step has a document input port which is explicitly
> marked “primary='true'”, or if it has exactly one document input port
> and that port is /not/ explicitly marked “primary='false'”, then that
> input port is the /primary input port/ of the step.]"
>
> In your pipeline, you have defined more than one input port, none of
> which is marked primary="true", so the condition stated above is not met.
>
> Tobias
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 08:58:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 March 2009 08:58:17 GMT