W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > March 2009

RE: Calabash: non-primary input port erroneously connected?

From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 03:15:24 -0400
Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC7870F0790C0@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>
To: <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Hi Tobias,

You are right - your pipeline should produce a static error.

Regards,
Vojtech 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xproc-dev-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:xproc-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Vogt
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:42 PM
> To: xproc-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Calabash: non-primary input port erroneously connected?
> 
> I believe there is an error in the way Calabash handles non-primary
> input ports. Running the following pipeline with Calabash 0.9.6:
> 
> <p:declare-step xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/ns/xproc" xmlns:t="test"
> name="pipeline">
> 	<p:input port="source">
> 		<p:inline>
> 			<inline-doc/>
> 		</p:inline>
> 	</p:input>
> 	<p:output port="result"/>
> 
> 	<p:declare-step type="t:identity" name="iden-step">
> 		<p:input port="source-port" primary="false"/>
> 		<p:output port="result-port"/>
> 
> 		<p:identity name="iden"/>
> 
> 	</p:declare-step>
> 
> 	<t:identity/>
> 
> </p:declare-step>
> 
> will return:
> <inline-doc xmlns:t="test"/>
> 
> According to the XProc spec: "If a step has a single input 
> port and that
> port is explicitly marked "primary='false'", or if a step has 
> more than
> one input port and none is explicitly marked as the primary, then the
> primary input port of that step is undefined."
> 
> Since the single input port of step type t:identity is marked primary
> false, I think the processor should not have connected it and should
> have returned an error instead. Can someone confirm my assumption?
> 
> Tobias
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 07:16:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 31 March 2009 07:16:14 GMT