W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Calumet and relative URIs

From: David A. Lee <dlee@calldei.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:57:24 -0400
Message-ID: <4A6F9064.8010401@calldei.com>
To: Florent Georges <fgeorges@gmail.com>
CC: Michael Sokolov <sokolov@ifactory.com>, Toman_Vojtech@emc.com, xproc-dev@w3.org
This makes good sense to me, it depends on the context.
I could imagine a context where it should be relative to a DB (say in 
eXists or ML).




David A. Lee
dlee@calldei.com  
http://www.calldei.com
http://www.xmlsh.org
812-482-5224



Florent Georges wrote:
> 2009/7/29 David A. Lee wrote:
>
>   
>> I've done this before in custom code, and its a great idea to
>> be able to bundle "script data" (say xproc, xquery, xslt) with
>> the JAR files.  It was particularly useful when I had an
>> .xquery file that needed to load a module but insisted on
>> looking in the current directory instead of the .jar file !
>> ug.
>>     
>
>   
>> But should it be the "default"? That would add yet more
>> confusion, IMHO.
>>     
>
>   Depends on the context IMHO.  That should be the default in the
> Facade class aimed to be used in a Java EE environment, and the
> current directory should be used in the Facade class used by the
> command line frontend.
>
>   IMHO.  Regards,
>
>   
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:58:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 July 2009 23:58:07 GMT