W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: XProc is extensible. How so?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:45:49 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m28wlket0i.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:

>> "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> writes:
>> > Does that mean a pipeline may run on one XProc processor 
>> but not another?
>> 
>> Yes. A pipeline that uses extension steps may not run on another
>> processor.
>
> Even if the pipeline contains extension steps unsupported by some
> processors, it may still be possible to run the pipeline with these
> processors. XProc contains a built-in XPath function p:step-available,
> which allows you to do things like:

Very good point!

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Doubt is to certainty as neurosis is to
http://nwalsh.com/            | psychosis. The neurotic is in doubt and
                              | has fears about persons and things; the
                              | psychotic has convictions and makes
                              | claims about them. In short, the
                              | neurotic has problems, the psychotic
                              | has solutions.--Thomas Szasz

Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 14:46:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 April 2009 14:46:37 GMT