W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: XProc is extensible. How so?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:13:49 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2skjtg8hu.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> writes:
> Does that mean a pipeline may run on one XProc processor but not another?

Yes. A pipeline that uses extension steps may not run on another

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I often marvel that while each man
http://nwalsh.com/            | loves himself more than anyone else, he
                              | sets less value on his own estimate
                              | than on the opinions of others.--Marcus
                              | Aurelius

Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 20:14:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 20:14:33 GMT