W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: XProc is extensible. How so?

From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:59:33 -0400
To: "'xproc-dev@w3.org'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9E51F88D5247B648908850C35A3BBB5003F245AA7F@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>

>> How is XProc extensible?  

>Implementations can provide a mechanism to 
> define new atomic steps entirely independent 
> of existing steps. Implementors can provide 
> a mechanism to define new functions.

Does that mean a pipeline may run on one XProc processor but not another?

/Roger
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 20:00:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 20:00:14 GMT