W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: XProc is extensible. How so?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:29:44 -0400
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m23abul4gn.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> writes:
>> Because it's fairly general purpose and extensible ....
> How is XProc extensible?  

You can define your own steps (in terms of other XProc steps) and use
them just like every other atomic step. Implementations can provide a
mechanism to define new atomic steps entirely independent of existing
steps. Implementors can provide a mechanism to define new functions.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We learn from experience that not
http://nwalsh.com/            | everything which is incredible is
                              | untrue.--Cardinal De Retz

Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 11:30:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC