W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Where's the parallelize step?

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:32:10 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0904200432r7bf71d26nde04059d71403754@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
I did bring this up via public mailing list of the idea of an
attribute to provide as a hint to parallelize but I think it wasnt
really considered.

will trawl through archives.

cheers, Jim Fuller

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> Why doesn't XProc have a parallelize step? That is, a step that enables two subpipelines to proceed in parallel. Is there any discussion of adding a parallelize step to XProc?
> >From what I've read about workflow, parallelize seems to be a basic feature of workflow languages (along with iteration, choice, and sequencing ... all of which XProc has).
> /Roger
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 11:32:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC