- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:32:10 +0200
- To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: "xproc-dev@w3.org" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
I did bring this up via public mailing list of the idea of an attribute to provide as a hint to parallelize but I think it wasnt really considered. will trawl through archives. cheers, Jim Fuller On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Why doesn't XProc have a parallelize step? That is, a step that enables two subpipelines to proceed in parallel. Is there any discussion of adding a parallelize step to XProc? > > >From what I've read about workflow, parallelize seems to be a basic feature of workflow languages (along with iteration, choice, and sequencing ... all of which XProc has). > > /Roger > > >
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 11:32:53 UTC