W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Where's the parallelize step?

From: Costello, Roger L. <costello@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:30:07 -0400
To: "'xproc-dev@w3.org'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9E51F88D5247B648908850C35A3BBB5003F245A9FF@IMCMBX3.MITRE.ORG>

Hi Folks,

Why doesn't XProc have a parallelize step? That is, a step that enables two subpipelines to proceed in parallel. Is there any discussion of adding a parallelize step to XProc? 

>From what I've read about workflow, parallelize seems to be a basic feature of workflow languages (along with iteration, choice, and sequencing ... all of which XProc has).

/Roger
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 11:30:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 April 2009 11:30:45 GMT