W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Compute attribute value with set-attribute

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 02:03:53 +0200
Message-ID: <ebaca5bf0904071703x3e0e1414g782440cd7af220b1@mail.gmail.com>
To: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Cc: James Sulak <jsulak@gmail.com>, XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
2009/4/7 mozer wrote:

> I agree with your analysis, but you miss one important point in it :
> you may end up having to give a name to a bunch of component for that,
> which might become troublesome at some point

  Maybe.  If we say that most of p:with-option are bound to the same
port than their step, most of which are in turn bound to the default
readable port, I think that this is actually a good default.  And
after more thoughts, I guess this is the case.

Florent Georges
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 00:04:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC