W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > April 2009

[closed] Re: 'Sequence of documents'

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:39:44 -0700
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m2d4bob0tb.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes:
> Am I right in thinking xproc may be the first W3C CR/Rec to use that term?
> XSLT uses 'collection' for something not dissimilar.
>
> I note it simply because the term is not defined in the spec.
> I guess, not being overloaded, that is reasonable.
>
> If other recs wish to re-use the term, some form of definition may
> be appropriate?

The WG considered this and decided that a formal definition wasn't
necessary in our spec.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To probe a hole we first use a straight
http://nwalsh.com/            | stick to see how far it takes us. To
                              | probe the visible world we use the
                              | assumption that things are simple until
                              | they prove to be otherwise.--E. H.
                              | Gombrich

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 21:40:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 7 April 2009 21:40:30 GMT