W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > October 2008

Re: possible bug in p:iteration select

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:43:14 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60810010043y61453a1cybdfdac61b311b6b7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Josh Matthews" <joshmatthews@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>

You cannot do this

But you can do that

<p:load>
    <p:with-option name="href" select="string(.)">
        <p:inline><a>/path/to/file.xml</a></p:inline>
    </p:with-option>
 </p:load>

Regards,

Xmlizer

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Josh Matthews <joshmatthews@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> If you had a known URI, you'd do:
>>
>>  <p:load>
>>    <p:option name="href" select="'/path/to/file.xml'" />
>>  </p:load>
>
> Shouldn't this (and the original example) use <p:with-option> - I thought
> <p:option> was for option declaration, not invocation?
> I wonder if it'd be nice if you could also do this:
>
> <p:load>
>    <p:with-option name="href">/path/to/file.xml</p:with-option>
> </p:load>
> Not that it's a shorter shortcut than just passing the option directly via
> an actual href attribute, but it would be nicely consistent with XSLT's
> with-param, for those more familiar with that.
> Cheers,
> Josh Matthews
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 07:43:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 07:43:51 GMT