W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > December 2008

[closed] Re: p:pipeline within a step

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:13:12 -0500
To: XProc Dev <xproc-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <m263lkxnyv.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"James Sulak" <jsulak@gmail.com> writes:
> According to the content models in the spec, p:declare-step and
> p:pipeline can contain p:declare-step, but cannot contain p:pipeline.
> My understanding is that p:pipeline is just a shortcut for a common
> usage of p:declare-step, so shouldn't this be allowed?  (Or is it?
> Calabash handles a contained p:pipeline just fine.)

That's a simple oversight in the schema. Fixed now. Thanks!

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To create a little flower is the labour
http://nwalsh.com/            | of ages.-- Blake

Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 13:13:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC