[closed] Re: p:pipeline within a step

"James Sulak" <jsulak@gmail.com> writes:
> According to the content models in the spec, p:declare-step and
> p:pipeline can contain p:declare-step, but cannot contain p:pipeline.
> My understanding is that p:pipeline is just a shortcut for a common
> usage of p:declare-step, so shouldn't this be allowed?  (Or is it?
> Calabash handles a contained p:pipeline just fine.)

That's a simple oversight in the schema. Fixed now. Thanks!

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | To create a little flower is the labour
http://nwalsh.com/            | of ages.-- Blake