W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > December 2008

p:pipeline within a step

From: James Sulak <jsulak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:19:57 -0600
Message-ID: <7cb78b3b0812151819s2ff2b77cpe724b73a8cf1a694@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>

According to the content models in the spec, p:declare-step and
p:pipeline can contain p:declare-step, but cannot contain p:pipeline.
My understanding is that p:pipeline is just a shortcut for a common
usage of p:declare-step, so shouldn't this be allowed?  (Or is it?
Calabash handles a contained p:pipeline just fine.)


Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2008 02:20:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:03:04 UTC