W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xproc-dev@w3.org > December 2008

Re: p:xslt

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:52:27 +0000
Message-ID: <711a73df0812120652q7a4d236bib860122a2b4faa5f@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc Dev" <xproc-dev@w3.org>

2008/12/12 mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>:
>
> Well
>
> I'm in trouble with your point 2)
>
> 2. If there is no binding for a parameter input port on the top level
>> pipeline (the one that you start executing first), then it
>> automatically gets bound to an empty document.
>
> Did you really mean that ?

Seems like it
5.1.2

If no binding is provided for a parameter input port other than the
primary parameter input port, then the port will be bound to an empty
sequence of documents.

But note Norms point about p:pipeline vs p:declare-step!

Subtle :-)


regards





-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 14:53:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 December 2008 14:53:09 GMT