W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2007

RE: Determinization in case of ambiguity or Should XML validators report on schemas that violate the UPA constraint?

From: Shlomo Yona <S.Yona@F5.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:16:02 -0700
Message-ID: <B546C312A37C12438A22154026CDC7E0137632CF@exchfive.olympus.f5net.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>


Thanks for the reply.

I had another example where an xsd:sequence with an implied
minOccurs="1" and maxOccurs="1" contains particles with minOccurs="0".
What is the expected behavior when none of these particles appear in an
XML instance?

Is this valid or does this violate the occurrence of the xsd:sequence?


Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 09:16:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:12 UTC