W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2006

RE: [xml-dev] Two Questions - on XML Schema

From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:29:46 -0700
Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20060309172923.0403ccf8@rgmstimap.oraclecorp.com>
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Cc: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>, <rjelliffe@allette.com.au>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

At 3/9/2006 05:14 PM, Michael Kay wrote:
> >
> > Gee, Mike,
> >
> > I'm truly flattered at your assertion that [we] relational
> > people messed up
> > some "clean design".  Didn't realize we had that much power. ;^)
>
>Well, let's just say that I think we would have had a more coherent set of
>basic data types if we hadn't had so many people throwing in their
>ha'penceworth from diametrically opposite directions.

I wouldn't argue with that...


>Come to think of it, the same is probably true of SQL.

In SPADES!
    Jim


>Mike

========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL)     Phone: +1.801.942.0144
   Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor    Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation        Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive      Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA          Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
=  Facts are facts.   But any opinions expressed are the opinions      =
=  only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody   =
=  else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand.  =
========================================================================  
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 00:37:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:54 GMT