>Are you suggesting that the empty string is not a string, or rather >that it should not have been a member of xs:string? I think that >would violate many more expectations than including it, as the REC >does. I was saying that my expectation was that an empty element did not have any content, string or otherwise >Or are you suggesting that the Infoset is wrong in failing to >distinguish the second and third 'hi' elements above? no, because they are according to the xml spec the same. they are empty.Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 08:07:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:49 GMT