- From: Jeff Rafter <lists@jeffrafter.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:06:08 -0700
- CC: Farid.Mahini@L-3com.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Some implementors take that view, but the W3C specs generally cite RFC 2396, > or more recently RFC 3986, which contain a more formal definition of the > permitted syntax, and also some semantic rules. Thus c:\abc.xml is not a > valid URI because the "\" character is disallowed, while c:/abc.xml is not a > valid URI because no-one has registered a URI scheme named "c". Agreed. Try any of the following (depends on implementation): a) file:/c:/abc.xml b) file:/c/abc.xml c) file:///c:/abc.xml d) file:///c/abc.xml (a) and (b) have given me the best results, but it really depends. Cheers, Jeff Rafter
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:06:09 UTC