> Does that mean the below set of schemas are valid? Does ID attribute > have applicability only with respect with the XML representation and > not with the includes? Yes to both. xan On May 12, 2004, at 2:28 PM, Bagepalli, Kiran wrote: > I had a question on id handling in schemas. > > For eg. if I have schema A.xsd > > <xsd:schema id="ABC"> > <xsd:include schemaLocation="B.xsd"> > <xsd:element name="x" type="xsd:string"> > </xsd:schema> > > schema B.xsd > > <xsd:schema id="ABC"> //HERE ABC value is repeated as a id > </xsd:schema> > > If we look at A.xsd as standalone XML having a id attribute it is > unique. > However since it includes B.xsd does the id declared here considered a > duplicate.Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 15:32:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:44 GMT