This is how it's done in the schema for XSLT 2.0: <xs:complexType name="versioned-element-type" mixed="true"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="xsl:generic-element-type"> <xs:attribute name="version" type="xs:decimal" use="optional"/> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:complexType name="text-element-base-type"> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:restriction base="xsl:versioned-element-type"> <xs:simpleType> <xs:restriction base="xs:string"/> </xs:simpleType> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name="text" substitutionGroup="xsl:instruction"> <xs:complexType> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="xsl:text-element-base-type"> <xs:attribute name="disable-output-escaping" type="xsl:yes-or-no" default="no"/> </xs:extension> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> This is doing what the post you refer to says isn't allowed: deriving simpleContent by restriction from complexContent. It seems to work! Michael Kay > > > In regards to restricting a complex type so that it only > contains text, has > this problem been resolved? The original post can be found here: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2003Jan/0028.html > > I looked through the errata at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments.html. > > I could not find any discussion of the problem. > > Thanks, > > Tait > > >Received on Friday, 4 June 2004 12:59:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:13:00 GMT