W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > August 2004

Re: Namespace problem

From: George Cristian Bina <george@sync.ro>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:07:19 +0300
Message-ID: <41234677.6070205@sync.ro>
To: Volker.Zink@porabo.ch
CC: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@epfl.ch>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org


I explained you the problem in my previous post.
If you just add elementFormDefault="qualified" to your schema the 
instance document will be validated without problems.

<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 

Hope that helps,
George Cristian Bina
<oXygen/> XML Editor & XSLT Editor/Debugger

Volker Zink wrote:
> Hello,
> 1. The Error mentioned was produced by the w3.org-Validator at 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv. Normally i use the validator in 
> my programming environment (VisualWorks Smalltalk), but i trust the one 
> at w3.org more, and it has more detailed error messages/warnings.
> 2. If i remove the "grips://xml.recom-verlag.de/comm/plem"-namespace 
> completely (including "plem:"-prefixes), i get following result
> ----
> PLEMGrips-Schema-Fall.xsd:6:5: Invalid: Undefined type 
> {http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}:FallImportExport referenced as type 
> definition of fallImportExport
> Problems with the schema-validity of the target
> ---
> I don't write an own validator. It just seems to me, that the validator 
> in VisualWorks has other results as the w3.org-validator, so i want to 
> know, whats really correct, and why.
> As a programmer i use namespaces everyday. But XML-namespaces are a bit 
> strange to me compared to the namespaces in VisualWorks Smalltalk. But 
> probably because in XML its all about syntax, in Smalltalk its about 
> objects (classes). One object is in one namespace. Thats quite easy.
> Volker
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2004 12:06:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:06 UTC