W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Announcment - JBind a Java-XML Databinding Framework

From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 14:15:09 +0200
Message-ID: <008b01c25b1f$34076990$2fd721c0@caliente>
To: "Stefan Wachter" <Stefan.Wachter@gmx.de>
Cc: "xmlschema-dev" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

> I would be happy if some of you could have a look on it and give me
> feedback. I would be especially thankful for comments on the extensions
> that I added to XML schema.

The idea of specifying logic in a schema is certainly compelling. On the
other hand we use schemas not for generating code for internal use but to
allow other organizations to work with our data without having to write all
the object model and marshalling code themselves, *if they are not also
using Java*, that is, in which case they can use the more powerful tools we
provide. For any extensions to be of any use, they must therefore by widely
available and standardized. Of course someone always has to make a
beginning...

Another issue is that you probably won't be able to specify all behavior you
may want to attach to your data with such extensions, unless the extension
would in fact contain a full-blow programming language independent
programming language. For the time being I would rather specify all behavior
in plain English than having a half-half solution.

One question (before I actually try it out...): does your framework
(un)marshal large files that don't fit into memory?

Also, is the licensing term really open-source compatible? Not that I object
to anyone getting paid for their work, but we must distribute our data
publicly and integrating features (even if optional) that require licensing
in certain cases is problematic at best.

"4. You may use the Package, a Modified Package, or a non-commercial product
that contains the Package or a Modified Package in a commercial environment,
e.g. a commercial product, a commercial project, or inside a company only
with the written permission of the Copyright Holder. Normally this
permission is granted after a modest attribution to the Copyright Holder."


--
Eric Jain
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 08:15:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:34 GMT