Re: ctA029.xsd (test case)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
To: "Stanley Guan" <stanley.guan@oracle.com>; "Schema XML"
<xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: ctA029.xsd (test case)


> >From reading the information on ID information items[0] in the XML
> Schema Structures recommendation it does look like uniqueness is
> supposed to apply to all IDs in the entire schema after validation
> (which includes imported/included schemas).
>
>
> [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#e-ii_table
>
> --
> THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #27
> I will never build only one of anything important. All important systems
> will
> have redundant control panels and power supplies. For the same reason I
> will
> always carry at least two fully loaded weapons at all times.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stanley Guan [mailto:stanley.guan@oracle.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:49 PM
> > To: Schema XML
> > Subject: ctA029.xsd (test case)
> >
> >
> > The expected result for the following test case ctA029 should
> > be valid:
> >
> >   Declaration with optional attribute id = 'foo123' , an
> > included object with
> >   and id='foo123'
> >
> > because the checking for uniqueness is within each document!
> > Am I right?
> >
> > Thx,
> >
> > -Stanley
> >
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection/result-ms-comple
> xType.htm
>

*********************************************************
Disclaimer

This message (including any attachments) contains 
confidential information intended for a specific 
individual and purpose, and is protected by law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should 
delete this message and are hereby notified that 
any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, 
is strictly prohibited.

*********************************************************

Visit us at http://www.mahindrabt.com

Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 12:03:02 UTC