W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Schema validators expected to support xml:base?

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:38:41 -0800
Message-Id: <8904C60CACA7D51191BC00805FEAAF4358EB2A@crdc-exch-7.crdc.kp.org>
To: "'Jeni Tennison'" <jeni@jenitennison.com>, "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, elharo@metalab.unc.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jeni Tennison [SMTP:jeni@jenitennison.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:20 AM
> To:	Roger L. Costello
> Cc:	xmlschema-dev@w3.org; elharo@metalab.unc.edu
> Subject:	Re: Schema validators expected to support xml:base?
> 
> > I did a quick look through the Structures spec and the only
> > reference that I found to XML Base was:
> >
> > "Before this specification is finally completed, we will need to
> > account for any changes [XML Base] makes to the Infoset in the areas
> > of QName interpretation and value space and the interpretation of
> > all aspects of schemas involving values identified as being of type
> > anyURI, including in particular xsi:schemaLocation,
> > xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation and targetNamespace."
> 
> (I think that you might be looking at an old version of the XML Schema
> spec. I searched the XML Schema Structures Rec and couldn't find this
> text anywhere within it.)
> 
Correct, it was in the PR version [1].

pvb

References
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/PR-xmlschema-1-20010330/
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 12:54:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:30 GMT