W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2002

Re[2]: Correct rules for ComplexType extension

From: Kevin Burges <xmldude@burieddreams.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:59:18 +0000
Message-ID: <1045082412.20020104205918@burieddreams.com>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org

>>> "having an <xs:all> group in a base type and extending
>>> it with a second <xs:all> group in a derived type is perhaps
>>> illegal?

nuic> Yup, illegal.  The general rule is that extension is defined as creating a 
nuic> sequence, and you can't have sequences of <all>.  Extension of <all> is a 

Oh crap. Thanks for the confirmation. Time so send off yet another bug
report to Altova...

-- 
groovy baby,
 Kevin                    mailto:xmldude@burieddreams.com

++++++++++++ Cool music - http://burieddreams.com/marshan
++++++ Attitude Webzine - http://burieddreams.com/attitude
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 16:05:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:26 GMT