Re: Default namespaces and <includes>

Mike_Leditschke@nemmco.com.au writes:

> So the two things I misunderstood were
> 
> 1. Chameleon processing applies to BOTH def and refs.
> 
> I got the def bit, but assumed that namespaces were the way
> refs were resolved. Hence my assumption that the default
> namespace carried into an included schema.
> 
> 2. Chameleon processing happens AFTER namespace processing
> 
> All the prefix info has been discarded and converted to equivalent URIs
> before the chameleon processing is applied. Chameleon processing
> as you describe it seems elegantly simple...
> 
> Thanks (as always) for the help.

You're welcome -- your self-criticism above seems correct to me.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

Received on Friday, 28 September 2001 09:43:13 UTC