Henry S. Thompson wrote: > There's already a proposed Erratum on the go to address this point. > It will clarify that only para 3 of section 5.4 of XLink is meant to > be referenced. Is there a public of these errata? I would probably waste less bandwidth on this list if I could read it! Thanks Eric > > ht > -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 12:13:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 July 2006 00:12:45 GMT