xml:lang is /not/ a part of XML Schema, it is part of the XML instance language. Thus, there is no change resulting from the evolution of the XML Schema specification. komal mangtani wrote: > > I have a schema that conforms to WD version and it has references to xml:lang. > what is the equivalent in CR? > > here is the snippet: > <element name = "FreeFormText"> > <complexType content = "textOnly"> > <attribute name = "xml:lang" type = "string"/> > </complexType> > </element> > > komal. -- Simon.Cox@csiro.au CSIRO Exploration & Mining T:+61 8 9284 8443 F:+61 8 9389 1906 C:+61 403 302 672 http://www.ned.dem.csiro.au/research/visualisation/ ====================================== We're moving 20th August 2001 to Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Avenue KENSINGTON WA 6151 T: +61 8 6436 8500 Postal Address: PO Box 1130 Bentley WA 6102 Australia ======================================Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 21:16:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:23 GMT