- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:31:28 -0400
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
At 03:03 PM 7/10/00 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >> I don't find targetNamespace useful if I can't find a local copy of the >> schema in the first place... > >Um, I'm lost. We're discussing a case where an instance uses various >namespaces, schema documents for which I have local copies of. What >it _means_ to have a schema document for a namespace is to have a >schema document whose 'targetNamespace' attribute is the name of that >namespace. So when I provide those local copies to the >schema-validation process, I've essentially provided both LHS >(targetNamespace) and RHS (local filename for schema document) >for a catalog. I thought the question was regarding how to provide those local copies - it looks like I may have misread the original question. Sadly, I think my question remains largely unanswered, but given the current state of URI processing, I think it's wiser to take it to a different forum. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Monday, 10 July 2000 10:28:54 UTC