W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > December 2000


From: Tom Gaven <tom.gaven@xmls.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:45:43 -0500
To: "'David Valera'" <dvalera@pcl-hage.nl>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c065e4$eba76960$1828150a@xmls>
Yes, but we have an XML (instance) DOM, an SVG DOM, an HTML DOM, it seems to
me like an XML Schema DOM would be very useful.
I s'pose you could also build XML Schema SAX interfaces, as well!!

-----Original Message-----
From: David Valera [mailto:dvalera@pcl-hage.nl]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 8:24 AM
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: RE: SOM

> Yes. Thanks. It would help if I only use DOM inside of my
> applications.
> But if I work with SAX, I have my old problem.

Then you would need an extension of SAX that would also 'model' XML schema.

> So I think it's useful to have a XML Schema object model
> intependent of
> DOM. In my first email, I used DOM only as an example of what I mean
> with object model.

I don't think it would be wise do develop a new object model to represent
XML schema. DOM represents XML files in general, and XML schema's, being XML
files, should be modelled in DOM.

David Valera
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2000 10:46:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:50 UTC