W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2000

Re: Which Schema to use?

From: <petsa@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 11:28:02 -0400
To: "Bengul, Enis A CECOM SEC" <bengul@mail1.MONMOUTH.ARMY.MIL>
cc: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <852568C8.0054F02B.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
XML Schema has a set of stable public drafts that are in the last call
period
for Candidate Recomendation.  I suggest you use these.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/

All the best, Ashok


"Bengul, Enis A CECOM SEC" <bengul@mail1.MONMOUTH.ARMY.MIL>@w3.org on
04/20/2000 05:17:42 PM

Sent by:  xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org


To:   "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
cc:
Subject:  Which Schema to use?




I am starting to  develop a schema for our application.  Am at a loss as to
which schema spec  to use.  The W3C standard is obviously not yet out (when
will it be  finalized?).  Should I use Microsoft's (we develop in VB and C,
hence I  will be using their DOM implementation anyways) Schema, or what is
provided at  their Biztalk.org site (what is the difference between the two
anyways, and if  they are different, why did MS have to come up with two
different schema sets?)  or should I use a third party product like the few
listed in this list, or  should I go with DTD?  Is there a robust schema
spec that fully implements  the current W3C standard as proposed and has a
fully functional  parser/validator?  Tx for any suggestions.

Enis  Bengul
Received on Friday, 21 April 2000 11:28:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:17 GMT